Thursday, December 3, 2009

How to Fix the Economy

What to do, what to do...?

Sadly, my plans to become 'Overlord of the Galaxy' is going slightly more slowly than I originally anticipated - and my legendary status exists only within my own mind (a temporary setback, I assure you)...
As such, I am unable to inflict my terrible will upon that great vacuum of rational thought that is Washington, D.C. .... Instead of edicts, I can only make suggestions....

Thus, I present, The Weekly SubStandard's guide to fixing the economy. Prepare yourselves, gentle reader, for enormity of clarity and vision that you are about to.....well...visualize (where's a thesaurus when you need one...).
It is bold and concise in an era that sorely lacks both, a testament to human thought, a beacon of reason in uncertain times.... it is...pure genius. Drum roll please......

The way to fix the economy,
to bring innovation to the private sector,
to increase our standard of living,
to increase the number of jobs..
is very simple.


STOP FUCKING WITH IT


Breathtaking, I know...

Consider the following excerpt taken from a brilliant article by Conn Carol:
http://blog.heritage.org/2009/12/03/why-big-government-stimulus-fails/

In a January report, White House economists predicted the stimulus bill would create (not merely save) 3.3 million net jobs. Since then, 3.4 million more net jobs have been lost, pushing the unemployment rate above 10 percent.

This failure of government to spend its way to prosperity is not an isolated incident:

  • During the 1930s, New Deal lawmakers doubled federal spending — and unemployment remained above 20 percent until World War II;
  • Japan responded to a 1990 recession by passing 10 stimulus spending bills over 8 years (building the largest national debt in the industrialized world) – and their economy remained stagnant;
  • In 2001, President Bush responded to a recession by trying to “inject” tax rebates into the economy. The economy did not respond until two years later, when tax rate reductions were implemented;
  • In 2008, President Bush tried to head off the current recession with another round of tax rebates. The recession continued to worsen; and
  • Now, the most recent $787 billion stimulus bill was intended to keep the unemployment rate from exceeding 8 percent. Instead, it now exceeds 10 percent.

These repeated failures are not an accident. They reflect the myth that government spending is a free lunch. Stimulus advocates assert that government spending injects new dollars into the economy, thereby increasing demand and spurring economic growth. It makes perfect sense under one condition:

No one asks where the government got the money.

Congress does not have a vault of money waiting to be distributed. Every dollar Congress “injects” into the economy must first be taxed or borrowed out of the economy. No new income, and therefore no new demand, is created. It is merely redistributed from one group of people to another.

Removing water from one end of a swimming pool and pouring it in the other end will not raise the overall water level – no matter how large the bucket. Similarly, redistributing dollars from one part of the economy to the other will not expand the economy, no matter how much is transferred. Yet that is all the stimulus bill is doing.

If government injecting $200billion into the economy so far creates 640,000 jobs — as the White House claims – then by the same logic, first removing that $200 billion from the economy must cost about 640,000 jobs

Spending advocates respond that redistributing money from “savers” to “spenders” will lead to additional spending. That assumes that savers store their savings in their mattresses, thereby removing it from the economy. In reality, nearly all Americans either invest their savings (where it finances business investment) or deposit it in banks (which quickly lend it to others to spend). Therefore, the money is spent whether it is initially consumed or saved. It means all the money government borrowed for the stimulus, would have been spent by the private sector.

Let’s do the math. If deficit-spending represented “new dollars” in the economy, then the record $1.2 trillion in fiscal year 2009 deficit spending that began in October 2008 – well before the stimulus added $200 billion more – would have already overheated the economy. And if it didn’t there was no reason to believe that adding $200 billion more in 2009 deficit spending from the stimulus bill would suddenly do the trick.

So what should we do to create growth?

First, Congress should resist all tax hikes. There is no school of economic thought that would justify raising tax rates in a weak economy. Doing so would reduce incentives to work, save, and invest, and be productive.

Congress must also rein in runway spending. Last year, federal spending soared to $30,000 per household for the first time ever – up from $21,000 per household (adjusted for inflation) at the beginning of the decade.

President Obama’s budget would hike spending to $37,000 per household by 2019. It would more than double the national debt. This would raise interest rates, cost taxpayers trillions in net interest spending, and eventually lead to painful tax hikes

The only way to avoid this fate is to cut spending through four steps:

  • First, do no harm: Resist totally unaffordable expansions of government-health care and energy subsidies. Stop increasing discretionary spending by 8% annually
  • Then, take back unspent Stimulus and TARP money. They haven’t worked, and they are dragging us deeper in debt.
  • Next, enact spending caps. So that lawmakers can better prioritize.
  • Finally and most importantly, reform Social Security and Medicare. This is truly the most important reform, as these programs threaten to bankrupt the federal budget. A good first step would be adding the creation of a Bipartisan Entitlement Commission to the upcoming debt limit vote.

Let me wrap up by saying that — thanks to the economy’s self-correction mechanism — all recessions eventually end. And we may be moving out of the current recession. But its no thanks to the stimulus bill. We need to focus on building a strong economy recovery, driven by entrepreneurs and families. That means keeping tax rates low, and the government out of the way.

OK, OK.... Conn Carol elucidates the concepts far, far better than I do..(as such, the author will hold some position of great importance in my court when my coronation as Overlord is completed...) but the concept remains the same.

Get the hell out of the way.

Then again, such an attitude would not permit the current administration such a glorious photo / P.R. opportunity as the recent 'Jobs Summit'....

Ah, the 'Jobs Summit'.....
Another rant for another time....

(side note, when I am recognized as Overlord of the Galaxy, any mention of a 'Jobs Summit' will be punishable by a junk punch...)


Tuesday, December 1, 2009

How to Blow a Potential Presidential Nomination Bid

Step 1
Grant clemency to a man with multiple felony convictions, violent ones

Step 2
Have said repeat felony committing individual (that you granted clemency to, by the way) commit multiple murders

Step 3
Have said victims of aforementioned repeat felony committing individual....that you granted clemency to.... kill police officers (firefighters, soldiers or children would also likely produce a similar effect)

Step 4
(and this is vitally important)
Quickly launch into spin-doctoring mode, blaming others for your decision.
Because that's what everyone wants from a potential commander-in-chief is someone who can quickly blame his failures on everyone else.
Is it the judge's fault? The DA's office's fault? The prison board's fault? Josie and the Pussycats' fault?
No.
It is yours.

Leaders do the following:
  • Praise others when things go well.
  • Take blame when they do not.
  • Do not whine about sub-optimal situations or conditions
  • Make decisions and deal with the consequences.
Mr. Huckabee, you are no leader.
At least not today.

If I want to listen to someone piss and moan about 'coulda, woulda, shoulda's' or blame others for their problems, I'll listen to president Obama. He's got that act down cold.

Meh.
What a disappointment.
More can be learned about a person by how they deal with failure than success. It seems that I learned more than I ever wanted to about Mike Huckabee....

and I didn't even use the word 'douchebag'......
Aw hell. So close, so very close.....

Friday, November 27, 2009

Semper Cry

.... ok, Marines don't actually cry - they have their tear ducts removed during basic training....

So I will cry for them (in a manly sort of way)
and for the rest of the armed services.

You may be asking yourself, 'self, what the hell is this nutbag talking about this time?' Consider the following....

Exhibit A -
Political correctness and the Hasan debacle. It is readily apparent to all but the most insanely liberal of fringe, brain dead lunatics that the Amy allowed a substandard performing and dangerous soldier to promoted through the ranks because of his status as a 'protected minority'. Efforts to point out Hasan's obvious deficiencies and concerning behavior were halted for fear of backlash. The 'stick' of an EO (equal opportunity) complaint - even a warrantless one was obviously a much greater motivator than the 'carrot' of doing the right thing. The Army placed a higher premium on 'diversity' than little things like 'honor, integrity and ultimately, the lives of the soldiers under its command. And yet even after this abject failure, Gen. Casey defends this pitiful excuse for a policy, fearing diversity as a greater casualty than the lives of soldiers.... a pathetic embarrassment..

Exhibit B -
4 Blackwater security guards are tortured, mutilated, murdered and strung up on a bridge. A team of SEALs is tasked with hunting down and capturing the mastermind. They are successful (as if there were to be any other alternative). There were not songs of glory to greet them, no round of drinks to be bought, no medals to be awarded, not even an 'attaboy'. Instead, they awarded non-judicial punishment. Why? Because the perpetrator had a bloody lip. A bloody f*ing lip and they get the 'captain's mast'.... Now these commandos gave 'the mast' 'the finger' and the punishment will be decided by court's martial. Yet again, we are more concerned with our enemies than our soldiers. Enemies that would hack of our heads and hang our bodies from bridges... and we are prosecuting our soldiers over a bloody lip.... This is a national embarrassment...

Apparently, our armed services has been infected with the same virulent strain of butt-stupid, self-destructive, 'progressive' insanity that has plagued the rest of our society. Hopefully, this infection is still in the treatable stage - because if it rots our military to the bone, our cannot stand.

Meh.
Must be the turkey hangover
Maybe I'm just cranky

or maybe I'm just tired of the stupidity.

I'll re-read this in a few days when the tryptophan levels have leveled out and see how I feel then.

Tuesday, November 24, 2009

An Incontinent Truth

......and it appears to be a 'number 2' at that.

It's been a rough week for Al Gore and the rest of the 'Global Warming' warming community.

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100017393/climategate-the-final-nail-in-the-coffin-of-anthropogenic-global-warming/

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/nov/24/hiding-evidence-of-global-cooling/

http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/bighollywood/2009/11/24/ed-begley-jr-loses-it-on-fox-news/

(and watching Ed Bagley melt down is absolutely beautiful)

Don't feel too bad for Al though, the soon to be 'Carbon Billionaire' still has the time and resources to hunt ManBearPig all he wants... (Southpark reference.....classic)

Some Incontinent Truths are these..

  • Many of the same scientists who claim the sky is falling visa vie 'Global Warming' also warned us of 'Global Cooling' in the 70s
  • Many of the same scientists warned us that our own population growth would destroy us and that we had to seriously consider decreasing the birth rate
  • After the age of Katrina, we were warned that we were in for ever increasing, ever strengthening hurricanes....hmmmm...don't hear about that too much anymore do we?
  • Al Gore, like Dr. Phil, is a colossal douchebag
  • An Inconvenient Truth, the gospel of Global Warming is the factual equivalent of a Michael Moore film.... without a fat slob with a baseball hat (and they BOTH won an Academy Award.... who knew?)
  • So all those warming periods that occurred between ice ages were caused by what exactly?
  • This, like Al Gore's ego, could go on forever....
Global Warming has been and always will be more about the redistribution of wealth than actual care or concern about the environment (Copenhagen anyone?). Followers of the movement have reached a fanatical religious zeal, suggesting deniers be 'strangled in their beds' or be tried for 'high crimes against humanity' (and that's from people in our government)... sure, we can have a civilized discussion here...

Undeniably, there has been lots of research supporting claims of Global Warming - but as the saying goes, you get what you pay for. Research needs funding. When those who are doing the funding have an agenda of their own, it is hard to get good science (think of the tobacco industry funding a health study of the effects of smoking on the human cardiovascular system..... that make sense, right?)

Pure science, devoid of agenda or coercion needs to be performed. Lengthy, exacting, research- but that is unlikely to happen. Until then, all we can do is follow the money and see where it leads us.

Apparently, right into the pocket of Al Gore....
douchebag....

Sunday, November 22, 2009

Mare's Eat Oats and Goat's Eat Boats and Other Random Thoughts

Despite my best efforts, my tiny brain is more incapable of stringing together coherent thoughts than usual - so I have decided to go with a 'stream of consciousness' approach today.

Were I still a child, my mother would make me go climb trees for a few hours and come back and try again when I was exhausted - sadly, now one cannot climb trees as environmentalists would claim that the tree would be damaged, or it's feelings hurt or some idiocy - and even if you could escape their notice legal liability would prevent it... as one might fall and sue someone... That aside, if said act were performed and witnessed, Child Protective Services would be called...... after all, such activity is dangerous....
yet I digress.....

  • Blue Dogs roll over and play dead....or at least brain dead anyway. Although one of them got a bone for her troubles ....a BIG one. To secure her vote, Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-La.) was presented with a $300 million incentive from Harry Reid (and reportedly, a belly-rub as well)... Hmmm.... maybe 'brain dead' is only secondarily accurate following 'morally bankrupt' -and here I thought that "Blue Dogs" were supposed to be fiscally conservative? - then again, George W. Bush touted himself as a fiscal conservative..... so I suppose this particular betrayal of principals shouldn't be much of a surprise.
  • If it is true that the larger the government, the smaller the individual - then I am feeling pretty damn puny. Damn puny indeed....
  • I have come to the conclusion that the government is like Michael Moore. Government continues to expand at an exponential rate, much like Moore's waistline and performs about as well as Moore running a marathon. So why the hell do we keep feeding him cheeseburgers?
  • It has been said that when you rob Peter to pay Paul, that you can always count on Paul's vote - but why does Peter not get pissed? Say that 3 times fast...
  • If the Constitution were a 'living, breathing document' as many progressives insist, it would be so damn fat it would need a scooter to get around in.
  • If a tree falls in a forest and nobody is there to hear it, would it still be taxed?
  • 237 or 44% of congress are millionaires, you can't throw a rock in Washington without hitting a lawyer (and subsequently, get sued) and yet we wonder why our laws are so out of step with reality...
  • and just in case i forgot to mention it, Dr. Phil is a colossal douchebag.
May the gods of clarity smile upon me next week so that my ramblings may take on some form of consistency....

Thursday, November 19, 2009

The I's Have It.

Apparently, in support of Obamacare, we have 2 types of people:
A) Ideologues
B) Idiots

There. I said it....and it had to be said.
Harsh, perhaps...but accurate nonetheless...

Before the ranting continues, allow me to make an observation or two (actually, you have no choice in the matter, but after starting out so rudely, I thought a modicum of politeness might be in order..)...
No rational human being can deny that reform is overdue when it comes to the delivery of our healthcare system. Of course, some reform - such as interstate competition amongst providers is not being discussed. Others, such as tort reform is essentially taboo given the truly ginormous amounts of money given to the Democratic coffers by trial lawyers - and as such, will not be considered by this administration in any meaningful way....but we aren't talking about reform here. Healthcare legislation, in it's current incarnation, is not reform. It is change. Reform is the process of making adjustments to a system (hopefully for the better) while leaving the core of that system intact - if the reform ultimately is found to be detrimental, the system can then be reverted back to it's original configuration. This current incarnation amounts to change. Once we go down this proposed road, there is no going back.

There are a myriad of reasons why Obamacare is a terrible idea (oh, that's right, I used the word 'myriad'...because that's what the thesaurus came up with when i said 'a bunch of')... requiring hours of typing and subsequent ranting to do them justice...so I won't bother. I'll just stick with one.... Uncle Sam's track record.

Our dear Uncle is many things and efficient isn't one of them. He tends to overreach, underperform and greatly underestimate the amount of money that will be required to do any particular project. Consider the following failures (we'll start with the public/private co-ops, since the Obamacare likes to talk so much about the 'public option'....:


Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac - this public/private abomination's failures were instrumental (although certainly not solely responsible) for the housing market collapse and subsequent recession from which we are supposed to be joblessly recovering from... Uncle Sam now owns 5 trillion in bad mortgages.... do you know how many cheeseburgers 5 trillion dollars could buy?

AMTRAK - Never made a profit, never will. Keeps chugging along on waste and stupidity. The little engine that could not...so it is endlessly subsidized. Over 30 billion thus far...

USPS - Neither rain, nor snow nor dark of night can prevent Uncle Sam from crippling the Pony Express to the tune of 5 billion (conservatively) over the last 2 years alone.... Thanks Uncle!

..........................................................................................................................................................................

and now, the big-boys.....

Medicare -
will be insolvent by 2017. Our population is getting older and Obamacare will slice off a few hundred million from the budget. So glad to say that dear Uncle has been spending that considerable chunk of change out of our paychecks wisely. Any thoughts on how the program will be funded after that? Anyone? Bueller? ( I forgot to mention, millions get scammed annually from the system and the government has done little to nothing to stop it... and that will change why exactly?)

Social Security -
2037. Done. Zip. Nada. Thank God that it will be 25 years after the apocalypse in 2012, so we really won't feel the sting....

FEMA -
Consider that in the aftermath of Katrina. 6.3 billion was spent by the organization. 1/4th of that amount was either scammed and/or wasted (CBO report). Small change comparatively speaking, but you get the idea....

Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit Reform -
The Bush administration initially pegged this beauty at 400 billion (10 years). The most recent estimate is 1.2 TRILLION. And here I thought everything was just bigger in Texas....
..........................................................................................................................................................................

My small brain is seeing a trend here.....

What rational being can possibly think that this can be done without bankrupting us? The writing is literally on the wall here. Obamacare (current iteration) will decimate the economy. Period. What planet do you live on if you think that this government program will be any different....?

.... So we are left with the ideologue. One who believes that it is the moral imperative of the government to provide these services to the populace, no matter the cost. Ideologues are entitled to their opinions and it is pointless to try to change them. We can just ask that they don't reproduce in great numbers....

So, we are left with 2 possibilities:
A) Ideologue
B) Idiot

At this point, we can ill-afford either.

Apparently, the "I's" have it....

Monday, November 16, 2009

Newt 2, Electric Boogaloo

Like the herpes virus, Newt Gingrich is back - and he's making me itch (not inappropriately, mind you - just that general 'heebee jeebee' all over type of itch).

Contract with America 2 you say? Really?
It seems that Hollywood isn't the only industry that can come up with a crappy sequel.
Not that the message is bad...

1) Jobs.. yup, jobs are good (and when an administration touts the fact that at least we aren't losing them as fast these days as their #1 accomplishment, you just know we're hosed)

2) Energy... yup, energy is a good thing. Multifaceted approach combining petroleum, nuclear, gas and 'clean' renewables can only be a good thing. Becoming energy independent would free us of the hypocrisy of trying to tease out our foreign policy from our energy policy. Of course, giving the country a 'Green Enima' in the process.... not so good. Having Obama the 'candidate' promising that he would bankrupt the coal industry.... terrible.

3) Health Care fix... yup, 3 for 3. A system that would encourage competition, lower prices and bring the responsibility back to the consumer.... we have a winner (as opposed to this steaming pile of poo that is being pushed around on the floor of the senate floor... now that's a visual for you... that is wrong in so many ways that it brings up even more images of steaming poo)

4) Education...meh. Personally, I would rather see government get out of education and have the whole shooting match (literally) turned over to the private sector. Don't we have enough state run indoctrination with PBS?

You may be saying to yourself, 'self, what's his problem? 3 of 4 is pretty good, (or 4 of 4 if you think we should get deeper into the indoctrination business) what's his problem? To which I would respond, 'I have many, many problems, most of them are personal and I would ask you not to bring them up again.' And then I would say 'Newt'. Sometimes, its not the message, its just the messenger.

NY-23 anyone? Sorry Mr. Gingrich, your street cred is whack. How do you back a candidate who essentially spits in the face of EVERY conservative principle and not expect some backlash? Don't give me this 'the party has to make room for different points of view' crap. That is only true when you have at least SOME principles in common. Scozzafava apparently had none. Your glorious plans to rebuild the republican party on a foundation of cards has failed....oops. Triangulated that one wrong buddy.

And nothing gives the appearance of looking forward like looking backwards. Sounds a mite hypocritical - and I just love hypocrisy... (kind of like elective abortion being on the health coverage for GOP employees despite the constant drumbeat of anguished criticism against the practice - kind of hypocrisy).... makes me all tingly inside just thinking about it...

So, ideas = good(ish) ... delivery system = (bad) ... messenger = (laughable)

Gingrich is about the 'power' movement, not the conservative one. His concept of 'Contract 2' is equally as ludicrous as the concept that the current health care legislation is not a veiled attempt at government takeover of 1/6th of our economy....but that is another rant for another day....